Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme identifies chemicals, drugs, mixtures, occupational exposures, lifestyles and personal habits, and physical and biological agents that cause cancer in humans and has evaluated about 1000 agents since 1971. Monographs are written by ad hoc Working Groups (WGs) of international scientific experts over a period of about 12 months ending in an eight-day meeting. The WG evaluates all of the publicly available scientific information on each substance and, through a transparent and rigorous process,1 decides on the degree to which the scientific evidence supports that substance’s potential to cause or not cause cancer in humans. For Monograph 112,2 17 expert scientists evaluated the carcinogenic hazard for four insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate.3 The WG concluded that the data for glyphosate meet the criteria for classification as a probable human carcinogen. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is the primary agency of the European Union for risk assessments regarding food safety. In October 2015, EFSA reported4 on their evaluation of the Renewal Assessment Report5 (RAR) for glyphosate that was prepared by the Rapporteur Member State, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). EFSA concluded that ‘glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans and the evidence does not support classification with regard to its carcinogenic potential’. Addendum 1 (the BfR Addendum) of the RAR5 discusses the scientific rationale for differing from the IARC WG conclusion. Serious flaws in the scientific evaluation in the RAR incorrectly characterise the potential for a carcinogenic hazard from exposure to glyphosate. Since the RAR is the basis for the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) conclusion,4 it is critical that these shortcomings are corrected.La lista completa de autores que integran el documento puede consultarse en el archivoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme identifies chemicals, drugs, mixtures, occupational exposures, lifestyles and personal habits, and physical and biological agents that cause cancer in humans and has evaluated about 1000 agents since 1971. Monographs are written by ad hoc Working Groups (WGs) of international scientific experts over a period of about 12 months ending in an eight-day meeting. The WG evaluates all of the publicly available scientific information on each substance and, through a transparent and rigorous process,1 decides on the degree to which the scientific evidence supports that substance’s potential to cause or not cause cancer in humans. For Monograph 112,2 17 expert scientists evaluated the carcinogenic hazard for four insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate.3 The WG concluded that the data for glyphosate meet the criteria for classification as a probable human carcinogen. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is the primary agency of the European Union for risk assessments regarding food safety. In October 2015, EFSA reported4 on their evaluation of the Renewal Assessment Report5 (RAR) for glyphosate that was prepared by the Rapporteur Member State, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). EFSA concluded that ‘glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans and the evidence does not support classification with regard to its carcinogenic potential’. Addendum 1 (the BfR Addendum) of the RAR5 discusses the scientific rationale for differing from the IARC WG conclusion. Serious flaws in the scientific evaluation in the RAR incorrectly characterise the potential for a carcinogenic hazard from exposure to glyphosate. Since the RAR is the basis for the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) conclusion,4 it is critical that these shortcomings are corrected.La lista completa de autores que integran el documento puede consultarse en el archivoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Comparison of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate-Conjugated and Texas-Red-Conjugated Nucleotides for Direct Labeling in Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Fil: Larramendy, Marcelo Luis. Cátedra de Citología. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Elrifai, Wa`el. Department of Medical Genetics. Haartman Institute. University of Helsinki. Helsinki; FinlandFil: Knuutila, Sakari. Laboratory of Medical Genetics. Helsinki University. Central Hospital. Helsinki; Finlan

Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Exerted by Pesticides in Different Biotic Matrices-An Overview of More Than a Decade of Experimental Evaluation

Agrochemicals represent one of the most important sources of environmental pollution. Although attempts to reduce agrochemical use through organic agricultural practices and the use of other technologies to control pests continue, the problem is still unsolved. Recent technological advances in molecular biology and analytical science have allowed the development of rapid, robust, and sensitive diagnostic tests (biomarkers) that can be used to monitor exposure to, and the effects of pollution. One of the major goals of our research laboratory is to evaluate comparatively the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects exerted by several pure agrochemicals and their technical formulations commonly used in Argentina on vertebrate cells in vitro and in vivo employing several end-points for geno and cytotoxicity. Among them are listed the herbicides dicamba and flurochloridone, the fungicide zineb, the insecticides pirimicarb and imidacloprid. Overall, the results clearly demonstrated that the damage induced by the commercial formulations is in general greater than that produced by the pure pesticides, suggesting the presence of deleterious components in the excipients with either a putative intrinsic toxic effect Larramendy et al. 4 or with the capacity of exacerbating 52 the toxicity of the pure agrochemicals, or both. Accordingly, the results highlight that: 1) A complete knowledge of the toxic effect/s of the active ingredient is not enough in biomonitoring studies; 2) Pesticide/s toxic effect/s should be evaluated assaying to the commercial formulation available in market; 3) The deleterious effect/s of the excipient/s present within the commercial formulation should not be either discarded nor underestimated, and 4) A single bioassay is not enough to characterize the toxicity of a agrochemical under study.Fil: Larramendy, Marcelo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Cátedra de Citología; ArgentinaFil: Nikoloff, Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Cátedra de Citología; ArgentinaFil: Ruiz de Arcaute, Celeste. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Cátedra de Citología; ArgentinaFil: Soloneski, Sonia Maria Elsa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Cátedra de Citología; Argentin

Meiotic studies in Lygaeus alboornatus Blanchard 1852 (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae, Lygaeinae)

The subfamily Lygaeinae comprises 58 genera with about 500 species distributed world-wide. Despite the great biodiversity of the taxon, cytogenetic data of the group is scarce. To date, only 26 species belonging to 12 genera have been cytogenetically described. As it is the rule for the order Heteroptera, all the species possess holokinetic chromosomes, and a pre-reductional type of meiosis, namely at anaphase I the autosomal bivalents divide reductionally while the sex chromosomes are achiasmatic and divide equationally. Available data reveal that all the Lygaeinae are characterised by a modal diploid number of 14 and an XY/XX sex chromosome determining system. In the present study the male meiotic development of Lygaeus alboornatus from Argentina is analysed. The results demonstrate that the species, though sharing the basic chromosomal features from Lygaeinae, has a diploid number of 12 (10+XY), being this chromosome number the lowest reported so far for the subfamily.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Meiotic studies in Lygaeus alboornatus Blanchard 1852 (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae, Lygaeinae)

The subfamily Lygaeinae comprises 58 genera with about 500 species distributed world-wide. Despite the great biodiversity of the taxon, cytogenetic data of the group is scarce. To date, only 26 species belonging to 12 genera have been cytogenetically described. As it is the rule for the order Heteroptera, all the species possess holokinetic chromosomes, and a pre-reductional type of meiosis, namely at anaphase I the autosomal bivalents divide reductionally while the sex chromosomes are achiasmatic and divide equationally. Available data reveal that all the Lygaeinae are characterised by a modal diploid number of 14 and an XY/XX sex chromosome determining system. In the present study the male meiotic development of Lygaeus alboornatus from Argentina is analysed. The results demonstrate that the species, though sharing the basic chromosomal features from Lygaeinae, has a diploid number of 12 (10+XY), being this chromosome number the lowest reported so far for the subfamily.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Exerted by Pesticides in Different Biotic Matrices-An Overview of More Than a Decade of Experimental Evaluation

Agrochemicals represent one of the most important sources of environmental pollution. Although attempts to reduce agrochemical use through organic agricultural practices and the use of other technologies to control pests continue, the problem is still unsolved. Recent technological advances in molecular biology and analytical science have allowed the development of rapid, robust, and sensitive diagnostic tests (biomarkers) that can be used to monitor exposure to, and the effects of pollution. One of the major goals of our research laboratory is to evaluate comparatively the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects exerted by several pure agrochemicals and their technical formulations commonly used in Argentina on vertebrate cells in vitro and in vivo employing several end-points for geno and cytotoxicity. Among them are listed the herbicides dicamba and flurochloridone, the fungicide zineb, the insecticides pirimicarb and imidacloprid. Overall, the results clearly demonstrated that the damage induced by the commercial formulations is in general greater than that produced by the pure pesticides, suggesting the presence of deleterious components in the excipients with either a putative intrinsic toxic effect Larramendy et al. 4 or with the capacity of exacerbating 52 the toxicity of the pure agrochemicals, or both. Accordingly, the results highlight that: 1) A complete knowledge of the toxic effect/s of the active ingredient is not enough in biomonitoring studies; 2) Pesticide/s toxic effect/s should be evaluated assaying to the commercial formulation available in market; 3) The deleterious effect/s of the excipient/s present within the commercial formulation should not be either discarded nor underestimated, and 4) A single bioassay is not enough to characterize the toxicity of a agrochemical under study.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Meiotic studies in Lygaeus alboornatus Blanchard 1852 (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae, Lygaeinae)

The subfamily Lygaeinae comprises 58 genera with about 500 species distributed world-wide. Despite the great biodiversity of the taxon, cytogenetic data of the group is scarce. To date, only 26 species belonging to 12 genera have been cytogenetically described. As it is the rule for the order Heteroptera, all the species possess holokinetic chromosomes, and a pre-reductional type of meiosis, namely at anaphase I the autosomal bivalents divide reductionally while the sex chromosomes are achiasmatic and divide equationally. Available data reveal that all the Lygaeinae are characterised by a modal diploid number of 14 and an XY/XX sex chromosome determining system. In the present study the male meiotic development of Lygaeus alboornatus from Argentina is analysed. The results demonstrate that the species, though sharing the basic chromosomal features from Lygaeinae, has a diploid number of 12 (10+XY), being this chromosome number the lowest reported so far for the subfamily.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Meiotic studies in Lygaeus alboornatus Blanchard 1852 (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae: Lygaeinae)

Fil: Bressa, María José. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La PlataFil: Papeschi, Alba G.. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Buenos AiresFil: Larramendy, Marcelo Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plat

Vitamin E prevents ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate) pesticide zineb-induced sister chromatid exchange in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The in vitro effect of the antioxidant α-tocopherol, vitamin E, on deleterious effects induced by the dithiocarbamate fungicide zineb and its commercial formulation azzurro on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was studied by using frequency of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), cell cycle progression and mitotic index (MI) as genetic end points. Both zineb and azzurro activities were tested within the range 0.1-100.0 μg/ml on exponentially growing CHO cells preincubated for 24 h in the presence or absence of 50.0 μg/ml vitamin E. SCE frequencies increased significantly over control values in a concentration-dependent manner in zineb- and azzurro-treated cultures at concentrations of 0.1-10.0 and 0.1-25.0 μg/ml, respectively. When target cells were preincubated with vitamin E, the number of SCEs was significantly lower than that observed in cells exposed only to 1.0-10.0 μg/ml zineb or 1.0-25.0 μg/ml azzurro, but higher than control values. Cytotoxicity was observed at concentrations higher than 25.0 and 50.0 μg/ml zineb and azzurro, respectively, regardless of the absence or presence of vitamin E. Regression analysis showed that the proliferative rate index decreased as a function of the concentration of zineb (0.1-10.0 μg/ml concentration range) and azzurro (0.1-25.0 μg/ml concentration range) titrated into cultures. For both chemicals, progressive concentration-related inhibition of the mitotic activity from cultures was observed when 10.0 μg/ml zineb or 1.0-25.0 μg/ml azzurro was employed. However, no significant alteration in cell cycle progression or MI was observed between vitamin E-preincubated cultures and those treated only with zineb and azzurro.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse